RH Prime Minister David Cameron Statement on Gaza and Russia to the Commons:
INTRODUCTION
Mr Speaker this is the first time the House has met since the tragic loss of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 last Thursday and it is right to make a statement about this and the ongoing crisis in Israel and Gaza.
The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant ISIL, one of the most brutal and dangerous terrorist groups in modern times which has captured territory in Iraq and Syria has declared itself an Islamic “caliphate” and called on Islamic factions worldwide to pledge their allegiance. The move is an expansion of the group’s ambitions to wage a war and pose a direct challenge to the central leadership of Al Qaeda, which has already disowned it. In a statement from the group posted on Islamist websites and Twitter, the group has renamed itself “Islamic State” and proclaimed its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as “caliph”, the head of the state. But the grope is not only a threat to the region, it poses a threat to UK national security with hundreds of British Muslims fighting there and will sure come home to cause atrocities here.
Here Below what Dr Tarel Heggy an Egyptian intellectual, thinker, author and opinion maker, writes about Russia arguing that without Moscow support to Egyptians and Arab peoples, America would have succeeded in implementing its plan for the Middle East to enable the power of darkness, the Muslim Brotherhood to control the region.
Dr Heggy Writes: Russia for me has always been a magical name.
Why I am writing about the rubbish on the internet and why I, a staunch supporter of free expression, fierce opponent to censorship and anti-regulations, can see the point of ( and empathise with) many of the people who back a European court action to correct (good luck to them !!) information about them and their data on the internet. What inspired me is personal experience. Only yesterday I discovered, that a young lady, close to my heart, had the WRONG information about my date of birth and my faith ( which caused some serious damage to our affectionate relationship- I hope we can repair), from some rubbish on the internet. The other reason, unfortunately, my fellow hacks and hacketts, seldom check information for accuracy. Equally in 2009 the Media Editor of the Independent newspaper, PUBLISHED a story about me when I resigned my post as Director of the Media monitoring organisation Just Journalism, and labelled me wrongly ( ethnically), he neither bothered to contact me, nor to check his own newspaper archives.. I worked for The Independent since I joined when it was founded in 1986 and until 1998 ( and continued to write for the paper until four years ago), and my personal information and files were available in his newsdesk; instead of checking facts he ‘guessed’. This thought in my head also coincides with the row over google and correcting or deleting personal information. I sympathise with the people who scream for regulation, although as an old fashioned hack and a staunch libertarian, I am the last person in the world who’d agree on censorship or some regulation blocking access to information. but my personal experience and what you can do when WRONG and confusing information is out there for the world to see and you are powerless to correct them? Continue reading
Before condemning Russia for using veto in UNSC, ruling Crimean referendum illegal or blaming Mr Putin for the Ukraine crisis, let us remember our glass houses, or our record of interventionism and above all EU role in creating this crisis in the first place.
ِTwo million voters in Crimea decided by over 97 percent yes in a referendum, to rejoin Russia (going back to 1954 status quo before the peninsula was given to Ukraine by Moscow without the Crimeans being consulted ) one day after Russia vetoed an American sponsored UN Security Council resolution aiming to block the referendum. Given the ethnic balance of the peninsula population the result was no surprise. Even a ‘no’ vote wouldn’t have kept the 1954-2014 status-quo since the other choice would have been more power to Crimea and less rule from Kiev.
While our Foreign Secretary carry on condemning the result, with a growing American size mouth, and threatening nonsensical un-implementable sanctions , and our Fleet Street subs coming up with cold-war-era headlines, let us just remember some historic facts about glass houses, goose and gander and the the like metaphors. We, and our American allies hailed elections in Afghanistan and Iraq ( countries with no traditions of fair elections or fair-play , and who don’t play cricket) as great democratic steps forward, even though they were held under military occupation ( or our & American troops kicking down doors while families having dinner was not “occupation” the same way Arabs and Muslims wouldn’t consider colnialising Spain, Egypt, and formally Christian lands AS occupation, but god’s liberation from infidels?); elections held while and terrible strife going on with car bombs round the corner from almost every polling station.
BBC, evening news, and Downing Street sources express cautious optimism that Russia’s president Vladimir Putin has opened to persuasion leading to direct talk with the Ukrainian acting government… evidence runs contrary to this optimism nonsense as Moscow doesn’t recognise the new regime in Kiev especially with Moscow is convinced that EU expansionist policy to swallow former Soviet Republics was directly behind the crisis.. the easiest way is to keep Crimea under Moscow control.
The latest spin from Downing is based on a telephone conversation intitated this morning by Prime Minister David Cameron and President Putin, which ended with only two agreed points, first the need for international community to economically support Ukraine, and second the two leaders to continue dialogue, obviously over the phone. Since Mr Putin is no exception from any other leaders who wouldn’t see eye to eye with his rivals in the west on the above two points, it is amusing how this can be interpreted as reason for optimism.
President Barack Obama’s attempts to isolate Russia by freezing all military co-operation and threatening to boycott the next G8 summit in Sochi in response to its armed intervention in Crimea, appeared to be unilateral, as the United States’ European allies show no appetite for imposing sanctions on Moscow.
Britain, supposedly the most reliable partner, is the least able to respond, according to documents held by a Cabinet Office official on his way to Number 10, who accidently exposed it to cameras waiting in Downing Street for just such an opportune moment.
The documents outline Britain’s options in response to Europe’s worst crisis since the end of the Cold War. We should not attend any Nato meetings to consider military actions, nor should we rush into trade sanctions or close financial institutions to the Russians, as this would harm Britain economically. Russian oligarchs invest billions in the City, and in property in wealthy parts of central London. There is also considerable British trade with and investment in Russia.
A bold suggestion by former Tory Leader Sir John Major can either be a headache or an opportunity for Chancellor George Osborne. The challenge of popular policy thrown by former conservative Prime Minister to Chancellor Osborne could turn into his advantage by subtle pressure on energy companies which could increase David Cameron’s government popularity.
If we follow foolish European Union Foreign Policy (God knows why they should have a foreign policy department, commissioner and team financed by our taxes) over Egypt, we risk a great deal of our interests being badly damaged, not just in Egypt but among Egypt powerful, rich influential allies like Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait and Oman as well as Jordan ( they are also essentially part of wider historic British interest in Middle East and the Gulf region).
While we continue the pinhead-dance whether ousting of Egypt first freely elected Islamist president Mohammed Morsi was a coup d’état, or, as most Egyptian see it, the army forced carrying the will of the majority to salvage their revolution, situation on the ground deteriorated fast.
Meanwhile our British media is full of pundits – hardly any of them have experience on the ground (and many of them never set a foot in the country), or wheeling Islamists and non-Egyptian Hamas London members (although misleadingly labelled to hide their identity) warning of Egypt sliding into civil war. While it is understandable that Qatar owned Al-Jazeera might have its own agenda for deliberately using the evocative term’ civil war’, it is hard to understand why ITN and BBC join this orgy of ignorance and use the inaccurate term? Egypt demographic realities just doesn’t lend any credit to such foolish prediction. What opened the floodgates to these ignorant predictions was the Monday bloody clashes leaving 51 dead civilians and four times as many inured, while also claiming four lives among army and police with four dozen injuries. It was an unprecedented tragedy. While Muslim Brothers and secularist continue to exchange spin-salvos of who to blame, the truth might never be known. Acting president Chief Justice Adly Mansour ordered a judicial inquiry. From history of such inquiries, and thanks to greedy lawyers on high daily rate, it would take years to complete and the actual truth might never be known, although tether are basic realities: Security forces excessive force and Muslim Brotherhood deliberate arming of their militia and placing them among people encouraged to join the sit in.
From police and army videos, and tweets by residents living in tower-blocks overlooking the square, anti-riot police fired tear-gas at Muslim Brothers protestors who surged forward after dawn prayer, which the police seem to have not expected.
Shots heard, allegedly by MB men (Doctors treating injured army soldiers and policemen say they removed shotgun pellets from the injured) nearby army soldiers with panicking fingers on triggers responded resulting in 51 deaths and injuries. Conflicting tweets from activists near the scene, on how violence started inflamed an already combustible situation. It became clearer that MB tried to put a spin suggesting police attacked them while praying, while presenting no evidence especially with everyone carrying a video capable mobile phones that could have easily recorded or photographed attack on Mosque during prayer; it is also implausible that Muslim policemen would dare to break such social taboo as to attack a mosque during prayer.
Rabbah al-Adawaih mosque square a stone throw from the Republican Guard officers Club where MB believe Mr. Morsi is being kept their under-house arrest conditions. A group of armed MB tried to attack the club, the police spokesman said in a press conference Monday, blaming MB for the violence. A police helicopter video showed MB men throwing petrol bombs from rooftop. Another police video showed MB men taking aim and firing weapons at police.
Evidently incompetent Cairo police were caught unprepared. Armies don’t train their soldiers for crowd control or how to deal with street protest, many said on Monday, this is a police job. The MB have a long history of violence – although their supporter in the media claim otherwise the MB never issued a short clear direct statement denouncing violence or revising their long-standing theocratic justification off their 1930 -1950s terror campaign of bombing cinemas, theatres and hotels and assassinating judges and politicians-. Their supreme guide Mohammed Badie, and other leaders inflammatory speeches and calls for Jihad ( Muslim word for crusade ) last Friday outside the same mosque prompted Islamists mob to burn cars, destroy property and attack secular opponents leaving 12 people dead and 321 injured in Cairo and Alexandria, while MB affiliated terrorists attacked El-Arish airport killing five unarmed guards and raised al-Qaeda flags in Northern Sinai. Hence violence by MB should have been anticipated and police should have been on full alert. Police chiefs failed to provide officers in the area with metal detectors to make sure no weapons or fire arms find their way to the mosque which has been under Muslim Brothers occupation since Friday 28 June when the protest started. Police should have been prepared by water-cannons and more crowd-control methods if needed. Not ideal but preferable to death and injury.
While acting president Chief Justice Mansour issued the constitutional part of the road map ( constitution re-draft committee to work within two weeks, referendum on it in four months, elections for parliament and president next February) MB called for an uprising using an alien ( non-Egyptian) word intifada; but it didn’t materialise, so far, as less pro-Morsi protesters in the square than it was at the weekend. The call prompted some idiotic predictions of civil war Syria style from American and some British correspondents.
Unlike Iraq or Syria with their ethnic mosaic, Egypt demographic realities provide little, if any, conditions that would generate a civil war. Egyptians, regardless of faith are largely one ethnic group, Nioltic Egyptians, no clans and don’t geographically group by faiths in different geographical areas. On the contrary, urban areas (where over two thirds of population live) are Mediterranean style blocks of flats with people of different faith share. The countryside economic patterns of small holding or crop-sharing enforced sharing regarding of faith for thousands of years. The five percent of ethnically Arab population living in Sinai or eastern desert have a different way of life that they never cared who ruled in Cairo.
The Mb call for intifada (non-Egyptian word first used by Palestinians for their uprising against Israeli occupation) could usher sporadic terrorist attacks by sleeper cells made of few hundred of Hamas activists who were given Egyptian ID cards by Morsi regime, intelligence sources claim after. MB leader Mohammed el-Beltagi said Monday that terror attacks against Egyptian government buildings in Sinai “could stop in one hour if Morsi is reinstated”, is taken seriously by Egyptian security. The next step expected is Egyptian army blowing up most of the smuggling tunnels between Gaza and Sinai where pro MB terrorist are carrying various terror attacks.
In the 1990s Muslim Brothers affiliated groups or born out of MBs works like Gamaat Islamiyah , Takfeer wal-Higrah, Nagoon min al-Nar, or Islamic jihad carried out series of terror attacks against Tourist sites, the worst was Luxor massacre killing 632 people ( 58 tourists) attacks on hotels, assonating artists and writers; but at the end a brutal campaign by Mubarak police managed to contain them. The regime made an historic error when tried to appear more Islamist in state media opening it to evangelists resulting in Islamisation by stealth. Given the mood this time and with spread of many independent and commercial media outlets, it is likely to be the reverse. The country can take a bit of some MB terrorism, as an Egyptian diplomat says, but this would ensure Muslim Brothers would never be able to get any more than single figure in any poll (latest Poll by American Arab institute found their support under 10% down from 22% six months ago and over 55% a year ago).
The background to how anti Morsi movement gathered momentum was that a group of younger generation activists known as tamrud (rebellion) emulated the 1919 nationalist revolution, by starting a campaign in April collecting signatures collecting signatures on printed petitions calling for president Morsi’s resignation, and holding fresh new presidential elections as people got disillusioned with an autocracy in the process of Islamisation of all facets of their lives, turning quickly into a totalitarian fascist theocracy. By June 25th they collected 22 Million signatures (two and half times those voted for Morsi). Tamrud and another dozens of political parties called for nationwide marches to overthrow Morsi on June 30 but was overtaken by simultaneous protest of millions on June 28, with initiatives taken out of the hands of politicians by street momentum.
The army had little choice but to act, as Tony Blair went around media studios say so. It was a case of damned if they acted and damned if they didn’t. The generals by default are not democrats or have patience or training for political intricacies. They flew in their helicopters observing what they estimated to be 18 million on afternoon of 30 June, (secularists say 35 million, and impendent media put it somewhere in between.) it wasn’t just question of siding with the majority of 15:1 against Morsi, but the army chiefs faced a real dilemma. They do not have the manpower or training for mass crowd control on large scale, and this time it was five to seven-fold the numbers of demonstrators who toppled Mubarak 30 months earlier. What would any army do in this situation? Asked Blair. They had to stop the country sliding into unpredictable anarchy.
Intelligence reports were accurate that Muslim broths secrete organisation have arms and many ready to use them as shown on Monday morning confrontation.
The army couldn’t wait with two sides come face to face the streets. Army chief, Gen abdel-Fatah al-Sisi (a devout Muslim handpicked by Morsi last November and thought to be Muslim Brothers sympathiser), in three separate meetings pleaded with Morsi to share power with all political parties in broad coalition. ( same advice given to him by his backer the American ambassador Anne Patterson – ) He refused encouraged by Muslim Brothers hardliners radical Islamist group Hamas in Gaza against advice from MB international organisation to make concessions in Egypt in order to keep regional gains ( getting US & EU to supply arms to Syria Rebels who are predominantly of MB affiliate, control of Tunisia, Libya and, Gaza). The army gave 48 hours ultimatum to ALL political trends and parties to come up with a power-sharing plan called roadmap out of the crisis. They all participated including ultra-orthodox Islamises like salafies and heads of Muslim Church ( al-Azhar) & Christian church ( al-Morqusiyah) , while MB refused. The power-sharing roadmap doesn’t stop Morsi or MBs from running for coming elections. There is no role for army in political life in the plan. There was no martial law declared (which remained in effect since Col Nasser days until Mubarak’s overthrow in 2011). They went by the constitution making the Supreme Constitutional Court, the interim ruling body until election is held.
The MB rejection of Chief Justice Mansour election timetable can only be understood as temporary tactics in their attempt to create tension hoping for American intervention to bed the will of the army. This is dangerous calculation as would further alienate them form the voters and reduce their ability to get enough seats in the next parliament to be of any effect.